At the
2010 Coaches College, I presented a poster on the session RPE TRIMP method. Although details are scarce, and you may have read about this monitoring system
elsewhere on my blog, I thought it may be useful here. At the very least, it will give you some normative data from the athletes and training - we need to make this kind of information more accessible to help all of our efforts.
As always, I have a disclaimer - this is only the first step in a monitoring program - my future applied work, research, and writings will address steps two and three in the process. Please check out the image at the very bottom of the post - this is the whole poster - I was quite happy with how it turned out aesthetically.
Pilot Study - Tracking Session RPE TRIMP During an NCAA D1 Men’s Soccer Season with Special Emphasis on Practical Application
Howard S. Gray, Satoshi Mizuguchi, Henry B. Nowell, Dr. Michael W. Ramsey, Dr. Jason B. Winchester, & Dr. Michael H. Stone
KLSS / Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education
Sport Performance Enhancement Consortium
East Tennessee State University
Johnson City, TN, USA 37614
Introduction:
Training in team sports has often been applied haphazardly, with random increases in intensity, volume, and frequency of training (2). As well as sub-optimal performance, this approach may also result in overtraining and injury (7).
In order to improve training practice, the first step that the sport scientist or coach must perform is to investigate what the athletes are currently doing. Second, an examination into whether the athletes are responding positively to the current levels of training needs to be carried out, before finally modifying training and creating plans based on the findings (2).
Various methods, such as volume load calculations in strength training, heart rate monitoring (HRM), and global positioning systems (GPS) for team and endurance sports are available. These methods all have their own strengths and weaknesses. There has been a difficulty in quantifying different forms of exercise into a single measure of volume. Use of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) as a form of monitoring has been found valid for a wide range of exercise types (5), including resistance training (11) and soccer (9). Session RPE training-impulse (TRIMP) is a product of the athletes’ perceived exertion for a session and the total training duration (4, 5). Another method, as proposed by Edwards (3), is a training load method based on time spent in various heart rate zones. Impellizzeri (9) found a strong correlation (8) between the session RPE TRIMP method and the Edwards heart-rate training load (r = 0.71, P < 0.001) during soccer training. To our knowledge, no such comparison between the above methods has been conducted with NCAA Division 1 male soccer players. Therefore, the purpose of this poster is to investigate and present a simple and cost effective way of performing the first step in the monitoring process, along with suggestions in how to move forward from that point.
Methods
22 players from an NCAA Division 1 men’s soccer team (N=22) volunteered for this study. Team data (mean & standard deviation) from the 1st day of preseason is illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. The procedures for testing have been previously described (10). The subjects read and signed informed consents prior to participating in the present study. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of East Tennessee State University.